Wednesday, July 13, 2016

China's Great Leap Forward

The Great Leap Forward and the Five Year Plan came about because of China’s need to modernize.   Mao intended for China to “stand up”[1], and it was clear that he intended to create a nationalistic, cosmopolitan China.  During the nineteenth century, China had been invaded by the Western powers, made to sign unequal treaties, pay reparations, and grant extraterritorial privileges. One of the main reasons for Mao Zedong’s Great Leap Forward was the need for China to develop without relying on foreign powers.  In order to do this, Mao and others developed a system modelled off of Stalinism, with a few distinct differences. 

Part of this system was the Five Year Plan for economic development.  It allowed for a complete change of China’s economy under communism, even though, according to some, it happened too fast for it’s own good.  The intention was to turn China into a major industrial power, by focusing on urban, industrial, and infrastructure projects.  “It was through the implementation of the policies of the industrialization of the state  and the collectivization of agriculture that the Soviet Union succeeded in building up”[2].  City housing standards were improved upon, and workplaces started to be organized based on communist principles.  Industrial and urban workers had more readily accessible medical care and educational facilities, as well as subsidized housing.  In order to provide these services and control the standards, the state ended up controlling a significant amount of industrial enterprises.  The power of the state grew exponentially.

Aside from the Soviet Union, China was experiencing a period of relative isolationism and economic ban.  Part of the drive to industrialize was the desire to no longer be reliant on imports from markets overseas. 

In the more rural parts of China, they organized the peasants into communes and collectivized land, in order to improve efficiency and equality[3].  Each commune was intended to be a self-sustaining community for agriculture and other small scale industry, such as steel production using backyard kilns.  In fact, Mao encouraged the peasants to stop growing crops and to produce steel instead.  He did this in the hopes that China’s steel output would increase to the point where it surpassed Britain’s steel production, thus proving the superiority of the Marxist style government.[4]  The communities were equipped with communal daycares, mess halls, and kitchens, under the assumption that this would allow for more labor to be spent on major projects for the development of agriculture and industry[5].

The Great Leap Forward was a failure, but it’s effects were numerous and far-reaching.  Mao stepped down as chairman the year after it began, and the whole program was criticized, especially by the Minister of National Defense, Peng Dehuai[6].  Peng was eventually replaced by Maoist supporter Lin Biao, who ordered a purge of Peng’s supporters from the military.

China’s foreign policy became more militant as well.  Previously, China’s foreign policy had been governed by the “Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence”[7], but after the Great Leap Forward began, this gave way to a harder policy.  When the Great Leap Forward started, Nationalists held the islands of Matsu and Kinmen, and the People’s Republic of China began a massive bombardment of the two islands in late August 1958.[8]  There was also an assault of propaganda against the United States and a declaration of intent to reclaim Taiwan.

China had retaken control of Tibet in 1951, but when the social revolution spread there, tensions rose, eventually coming to a head in the 1959 Tibetan Uprising.  Thousands of Tibetans fled into India, dissolving the sympathy that had previously existed there, which led to a brief war between China and India.  China eventually claimed part of India as it’s own, and the Soviet Union gave India its support, thus increasing the tensions between China and the Soviets.  This was one among several reasons for their split.  There were also smaller disputes that followed, such as when a group of Red Guards attacked the Soviet embassy housed in Beijing[9], as well as larger disputes, like the Sino-Russian border war[10].

The Soviets, previously one of China’s strongest supporters, eventually reduced the amount of economic aid and technical aid going into China, as well as refusing to continue to assist them in the production of nuclear weapons.  Mao maintained that the reason for the split was that the Soviet Union had deviated from true communism and the Communist Party of China criticized them as “Revisionist Traitors”[11].

Mao believed that the only way to overcome China’s traditional, feudal past was to advance economic development.  Although his various programs had and led to problems, in the end, that was what allowed China to become a significant world power.






[1] The Sun Shines Over the Sangkan River, trans. by Yang Hsien-yi and Gladys Yang (Beijing:Foreign Language Press, 1954), pp. 203-217.
[2]  Yun, Ji. How China Proceeds with the Task of Industrialization, From the People’s Daily. 1953.
[3] Wing Chan, Kam Cities with Invisible Walls (New York, Oxford University Press, 1994), 13.
[4] Haugen David, China (Farmington Hills, Green Haven Press, 2006) 87
[5] Renmin Ribao, Dec. 14, 1965. Trans adapted from Selections from the China Mainland Press (here after SCMP) 3609 (Jan. 4. 1966).
[6] Trans. Adapted from Memoirs of a Chinese Marshall-- The Autobiographical Notes of Peng Dehuai (1898-1974), trans. Zheng Longpu (Beijing:Foreign Languages Press, 1984), pp. 510-20.
[7] Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence, Peking, 3 June 1954, United Nations Treaty Series, vol. 299, United Nations, pg. 57-81.
[8] A Study of Crisis, Michael Brecher, 1997, p. 385.
[9] "Red Guards in Peking Attack Soviet Embassy." Reading Eagle (Reading, PA), August 16, 1967.
[10] Burr, W.; Richelson, J. T. (2000–2001). "Whether to "Strangle the Baby in the Cradle": The United States and the Chinese Nuclear Program, 1960-64". International Security 25 (3): 54–99.
[11] Chambers Dictionary of World History, B.P. Lenman, T. Anderson editors, Chambers: Edinburgh:2000. p. 769.

No comments: